Tweet
Tweet
Tweet
I wish I could have the year this cover was published; the source does not give me any information. If it was published any time close to when “The Virgin Suicides” (1999) was released, it would seem the photographer used similar techniques for the cover (perhaps to promote the film?).

I wish I could have the year this cover was published; the source does not give me any information. If it was published any time close to when “The Virgin Suicides” (1999) was released, it would seem the photographer used similar techniques for the cover (perhaps to promote the film?).

Tweet
LET’S TALK ABOUT PORN


No, not THAT kind of porn. Get your mind out of the gutter! I am talking about everyday pornography- the stuff that our kids see every. single. day. And you unfortunately have no control over this. No amount of cell phone or tv or internet regulating is going to stop this, people. It is the advertisements we see every. single. day. So get used to it.

You may be thinking, “wait, last time I checked I was not looking at naked people having orgies or people with weird fetishes expressing that in Madison Square Garden”. This may be true, but I will tell you, that despite your efforts to acknowledge the very obvious aspects of porn, you have been ignoring the subtle ones. 


Take this Gucci advertisement: a very high-end brand, known for artistic geniuses who create over-priced bags and sell them to a very small population, and somehow they end up rich and famous and have their logo spewed all over bags, hats, belts, and lord knows, maybe even your dog’s sweater. However, what may look like a simple ad that targets both the male and female population (they are showing both male and female models with Gucci paraphernalia), take an even CLOSER look at this ad:

This overly-slicked up male model (perhaps referring to a pedophile?) is sitting on a bench with his female friend laying over his crotch, with her ass in the air. Do I dare ask you to keep looking where his hand is?
The female model is face-down, looking away from her male counterpart, and is seductively awaiting her spanking once the cameras are put away. Do you want me to go into explicit detail about what her shiny legs are supposed to represent? Yeah, I thought I would let you go with that sexual innuendo on your own.
So what does this mean? He is sitting there with his legs open, and hers closed (a social norm we have been taught!), and Gucci will make hundreds of thousands of dollars just because this ad was plastered in a fashion or women’s magazine. For all I know, it could be in Men’s Health, but all of you will have to confirm that for me, given I am not an avid reader of that particular fine piece of literature. This type of ad is categorized under the “rape” category of pornography. Are you still struggling to see how this glamorizes this violent act towards women?

I’ll let you think about this one, based on your own knowledge of what rape entails and  how some of those characteristics have made their way into our children’s daily lives in magazines, on billboards, and get this one: by being influenced to have “the best of the best”, categorized by their friends. So, while your 9-year old may not know what sex is, let alone rape, just be reassured that they have been exposed to this pornographic image and you do not have the address either matter for them, because Gucci has already done that for them. Oh, and the brand has been sure to make these things look socially acceptable to little Johnny and Suzy, too.

LET’S TALK ABOUT PORN

No, not THAT kind of porn. Get your mind out of the gutter! I am talking about everyday pornography- the stuff that our kids see every. single. day. And you unfortunately have no control over this. No amount of cell phone or tv or internet regulating is going to stop this, people. It is the advertisements we see every. single. day. So get used to it.

You may be thinking, “wait, last time I checked I was not looking at naked people having orgies or people with weird fetishes expressing that in Madison Square Garden”. This may be true, but I will tell you, that despite your efforts to acknowledge the very obvious aspects of porn, you have been ignoring the subtle ones. 

Take this Gucci advertisement: a very high-end brand, known for artistic geniuses who create over-priced bags and sell them to a very small population, and somehow they end up rich and famous and have their logo spewed all over bags, hats, belts, and lord knows, maybe even your dog’s sweater. However, what may look like a simple ad that targets both the male and female population (they are showing both male and female models with Gucci paraphernalia), take an even CLOSER look at this ad:

  • This overly-slicked up male model (perhaps referring to a pedophile?) is sitting on a bench with his female friend laying over his crotch, with her ass in the air. Do I dare ask you to keep looking where his hand is?
  • The female model is face-down, looking away from her male counterpart, and is seductively awaiting her spanking once the cameras are put away. Do you want me to go into explicit detail about what her shiny legs are supposed to represent? Yeah, I thought I would let you go with that sexual innuendo on your own.

So what does this mean? He is sitting there with his legs open, and hers closed (a social norm we have been taught!), and Gucci will make hundreds of thousands of dollars just because this ad was plastered in a fashion or women’s magazine. For all I know, it could be in Men’s Health, but all of you will have to confirm that for me, given I am not an avid reader of that particular fine piece of literature. This type of ad is categorized under the “rape” category of pornography. Are you still struggling to see how this glamorizes this violent act towards women?

I’ll let you think about this one, based on your own knowledge of what rape entails and  how some of those characteristics have made their way into our children’s daily lives in magazines, on billboards, and get this one: by being influenced to have “the best of the best”, categorized by their friends. So, while your 9-year old may not know what sex is, let alone rape, just be reassured that they have been exposed to this pornographic image and you do not have the address either matter for them, because Gucci has already done that for them. Oh, and the brand has been sure to make these things look socially acceptable to little Johnny and Suzy, too.

Tweet
Now, I actually have to give credit to my mother for this post. She is the one that so graciously handed down to me her navy blue folding pocketbook from Coach from the 70s. It seriously is the one and only real vintage piece that I use and adore. 

So it looks like Coach is re-introducing its original styles (and thank GOD because I cannot take anymore of the ugly Poppy stuff they have put out there), and once again, I have beat InStyle (the fashion bible) once again to determine fashionable accessories. I actually should just work for them. They NEED me and my ability to find trends before they start. But maybe, one day, my time will come. 

Now, I actually have to give credit to my mother for this post. She is the one that so graciously handed down to me her navy blue folding pocketbook from Coach from the 70s. It seriously is the one and only real vintage piece that I use and adore. 

So it looks like Coach is re-introducing its original styles (and thank GOD because I cannot take anymore of the ugly Poppy stuff they have put out there), and once again, I have beat InStyle (the fashion bible) once again to determine fashionable accessories. I actually should just work for them. They NEED me and my ability to find trends before they start. But maybe, one day, my time will come. 

Tweet
I really love when this type of thing happens. This is a Zappos ad with no name-dropping, but they use shoes that I, of course, am able to identify. On the left is a Steve Madden bow-tied stappy flip flop thing (hey- I didn’t say I could identify the STYLE name, too…), in the middle, Nine West, and on the right, Same Edelman. Reason for my knowledge of these? I was either a) going to buy them b) they were at a price that my small budget could not afford at the time or c) did not know what color to buy. Or just all of the above.
I still am so sad I cannot get all three of these shoes as I feel that they each would contribute so nicely to both my clothing and shoe wardrobes. However, as said before, I am too poor right now to do so.

I really love when this type of thing happens. This is a Zappos ad with no name-dropping, but they use shoes that I, of course, am able to identify. On the left is a Steve Madden bow-tied stappy flip flop thing (hey- I didn’t say I could identify the STYLE name, too…), in the middle, Nine West, and on the right, Same Edelman. Reason for my knowledge of these? I was either a) going to buy them b) they were at a price that my small budget could not afford at the time or c) did not know what color to buy. Or just all of the above.

I still am so sad I cannot get all three of these shoes as I feel that they each would contribute so nicely to both my clothing and shoe wardrobes. However, as said before, I am too poor right now to do so.

Tweet
Do I dare….

purchase and read The Hunger Games? With all the hype about the movie, yes, I would be a late conformer, but what if it is actually good? Only issues comparable to this:

1) I heard about Twilight way before the movies came out, but I did not actually start reading them until after the movies were on DVD. Ironic, because I truly believe that besides Kristin Stewart’s poor attempts to play Bella, the movies are better than the books. Sorry, Stephanie Meyers, but seriously, if it were not for Jacob being hot on screen, I probably would have thrown New Moon across the room. 

2) Also, when I read Harry Potter way back at the wee age of six or so (it became popular in 1999/2000, years after I had obtained and read the fictional tale), I stopped having the desire to read it because:

a. My grandma was obviously a cool grandma because she gave it to me for my birthday and I truly felt like I should have special recognition for that (for whatever reason seems justified for a first-grader) and I was truly mad no one was paying attention to me that at the ripe old age of 10 I was already a trendsetter (clearly has followed me through today…)

b. No one in school (teachers included) thought it was possible that I had already read it years before. The publishing date proved for me to be able to do this, but for whatever reason no one wanted to think it was possible for a fourth grader to be able to read alone on that level. Which REALLY made me angry because I started reading pretty early (I think it was pre-kindergarten or whatever) and no one thought it was possible for me to do. I mean, yeah, it was hard to read at six years old, but I DID IT. 

C) There was a girl at my school who bragged about how she was trying out for Hermione (HA can you imagine I was a part of that age group?!) so she was just plain old annoying about the whole thing and I really didn’t want anything to do with stupid wizardry anymore. Vanessa agrees with me that this girl truly did milk it. Needless to say, she didn’t get the part. 

So, my question is, should I become the anti-trendsetter and read a book-turned-movie AFTER the movie has already received so much press? Or should I just stick to my gut the way I did with Twilight and let it be? Keep in mind that after that horrifying experience, I am probably the ONLY person who truly never finished the Harry Potter series because I was so frustrated by people’s lack to believe in my reading abilities at a young age. Needless to say, I have gone out of my way from then on to make sure I “call” all the trends before they arrive in stores, movies, books, whatever. I make it a point that I am capable of my abilities, and that I do read and write quite well. 

Well enough of that preaching, then. What’s your vote? To read, or not to read?

Tweet
Whenever anyone has called me a bitch, I have taken it as a compliment. To me, a bitch is assertive, unapologetic, demanding, intimidating, intelligent, fiercely protective, in control — all very positive attributes. But it’s not supposed to be a compliment, because there’s that stupid double standard: When men are aggressive and dominant, they are admired, but when a woman possesses those same qualities, she is dismissed and called a bitch.
These days, I strive to be a bitch, because not being one sucks. Not being a bitch means not having your voice heard. Not being a bitch means you agree with all the bullshit. Not being a bitch means you don’t appreciate all the other bitches who have come before you. Not being a bitch means since Eve ate that apple, we will forever have to pay for her bitchiness with complacence, obedience, acceptance, closed eyes, and open legs.

Margaret Cho (via feministriots)

(via newwavefeminism)

BIG BAD BITCH (via ouchangingsky)

Tweet
Tweet

Okay I am so sorry I am posting something completely irrelevant to my normal topics, but seriously, HOW CUTE IS THIS?!